May 26, 2020
Dear MMBB Family:
In MMBB’s ongoing effort to keep our employers and members informed about the latest laws that may affect you during these challenging times, here is a Supplement to the SECURE Act that became law on December 20, 2019. The Supplement provides a comprehensive review of these changes and specifically points out the stipulations most relevant to MMBB employers and members. Notably, those are the increase in age for RMDs and expansion of the costs covered in a “529 education” account.
We hope you find this information helpful and our Service Center is available to answer questions that apply to your individual needs. Please call us at 800.986.6222 or email us at email@example.com.
Grace and Peace,
Louis P. Barbarin, CPA
Chief Executive Officer
By Richard Hammar
In the waning hours of 2019, Congress enacted the “Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019” (the SECURE Act). The Act included several previous legislative initiatives that had not been enacted, and generally incentivizes taxpayers to save for retirement.
Here are provisions most relevant to MMBB employers and members:
You cannot keep retirement funds in your account indefinitely. Under prior law, you generally had to start taking withdrawals (called required minimum distributions or RMDs) annually from all employer sponsored retirement plans (including 403(b) plans) starting with the year that you reached age 70½ or, if later, the year in which you retired (if allowed by your plan). The beginning date for your first RMD was December 31 of the year you turned age 70½, although you could delay your first RMD until April 1 of the following year. But doing so meant that you had two RMDs for that year, due on April 1 and December 31.
The RMD rules apply to all employer-sponsored retirement plans, including 403(b) plans and traditional IRAs and IRA-based plans such as SEPs, SARSEPs, and SIMPLE IRAs. Retirement plan participants and IRA owners are responsible for taking the correct amount of RMDs on time every year from their accounts. They face stiff penalties for failure to do so.
Key point. If you do not take any distributions, or if the distributions are not large enough, you may have to pay a 50 percent excise tax on the amount not distributed as required.
Generally, an RMD is calculated for each account by dividing the prior December 31 balance of that IRA or retirement plan account by a life expectancy factor that the IRS publishes in tables in Publication 590-B, Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). Choose the life expectancy table to use based on your situation.
Key point. When mandatory distributions from qualified retirement plans based on age were added to the tax code in 1962, the life expectancy of Americans was shorter. In addition, increasing numbers of Americans are continuing to work past traditional retirement ages. Based on these circumstances, Congress concluded that it is appropriate to increase the age by which RMDs must be made to more accurately reflect present-day conditions.
The SECURE Act changes the age on which the beginning date for RMDs is based, from the calendar year in which the employee or IRA owner attains 70½ years to the calendar year in which the employee or IRA owner attains 72 years. However, prior law continues to apply to employees and IRA owners who attain age 70½ prior to January 1, 2020.
This provision is effective for distributions required to be made after December 31, 2019, for employees and IRA owners who attain age 70½ after December 31, 2019. In all other respects, prior law treatment of RMDs is not affected.
Caution. The terms of your employer-sponsored retirement plan may allow employees to wait until the year they retire to take their first RMD. Alternatively, a plan may require employees to begin receiving distributions by April 1 of the year after they reach age 72 even if they have not retired. In some cases, employers will need to amend their plan to enable employees to benefit from the new rule.
Key point. What has not changed is the requirement to actuarially adjust accrued benefit for an employee who retires in a calendar year after the year the employee attains age 70½, to take into account the period after age 70½ in which the employee was not receiving any benefits under the plan.
After the first RMD, you must take subsequent RMDs by December 31 of each year beginning with the calendar year containing your required beginning date. The first year following the year you reach age 72 you will generally have two required distribution dates: an April 1 withdrawal (for the year you turn 72), and an additional withdrawal by December 31 (for the year following the year you turn 72). To avoid having both amounts included in your income for the same year, you can make your first withdrawal by December 31 of the year you turn 72 instead of waiting until April 1 of the following year.
To avoid having both amounts included in your income for the same year, you can make your first withdrawal by December 31 of the year you turn 72 instead of waiting until April 1 of the following year.
Example. Pastor John reaches age 72 on August 20, 2022. He must receive his first RMD by April 1, 2023, based on his 2022 year-end balance. He must receive his second required minimum distribution by December 31, 2023, based on his 2022 year-end balance. If Pastor John receives his initial RMD for 2022 on April 1, 2023, then both his 2022 and 2023 distributions will be included in income on his 2023 income tax return. To avoid this problem, Pastor John should receive his first RMD by December 22, 2022.
Note the following additional developments regarding RMDs:
Under prior law, an individual who had attained age 70½ by the close of a year was not permitted to make contributions to a traditional IRA. This restriction did not apply to contributions to a Roth IRA. In addition, employees over age 70½ were not precluded from contributing to employer-sponsored plans.
The SECURE Act repeals the prohibition on contributions to a traditional IRA by an individual who has attained age 70½. This change was based on the reality that as Americans live longer, increasing numbers are continuing to work past traditional retirement ages. This provides such working individuals with current income, as well as the potential for additional retirement savings. An individual working past age 70½ may contribute to an employer-sponsored retirement plan, if available, or to a Roth IRA or to a traditional IRA.
This provision applies to contributions made for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
Expansion of “Section 529” education savings accounts to cover costs associated with student loan repayments and certain costs associated with elementary and secondary education
A section 529 plan (also known as a “qualified tuition plan”) is a plan operated by a state or educational institution with tax advantages and potentially other incentives to make it easier to save for college and other post-secondary training for a designated beneficiary, such as a child or grandchild.
The main tax advantage of a 529 plan is that earnings are not subject to federal tax and generally are not subject to state tax when used for the qualified education expenses of the designated beneficiary, such as tuition, fees, books, as well as room and board. Contributions to a 529 plan, however, are not deductible.
Contributions to a 529 plan cannot exceed the amount necessary to provide for the qualified education expenses of the beneficiary. If you contribute to a 529 plan, however, be aware that there may be gift tax consequences if your contributions, plus any other gifts, to a particular beneficiary exceed $15,000 during the year.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 modified section 529 plans to allow such plans to distribute not more than $10,000 in expenses for tuition incurred during the taxable year in connection with the enrollment or attendance of the designated beneficiary at a public, private, or religious elementary or secondary school. This limitation applies on a per-student basis, rather than a per-account basis. Thus, although an individual may be the designated beneficiary of multiple accounts, that individual may receive a maximum of $10,000 in distributions free of tax, regardless of whether the funds are distributed from multiple accounts. Any excess distributions received by the individual would be treated as a distribution subject to tax under the general rules of section 529.
The final text of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act deleted a provision modifying the definition of higher education expenses to include certain expenses incurred in connection with a homeschool.
The SECURE Act makes the following three changes to 529 plans.
First, the Act allows tax-free treatment to apply to distributions made for certain expenses in connection with a homeschool. Under the provision, distributions for certain homeschool expenses are treated in the same manner as distributions for qualified higher education expenses, and like distributions for elementary and secondary school tuition are also subject to an annual limit of $10,000 in aggregate 529 distributions, per beneficiary.
For these purposes, qualifying homeschool expenses are those expenses, with respect to a beneficiary, which are incurred in connection with a homeschool and are for: curriculum and curricular materials; books or other instructional materials; online educational materials; tuition for tutoring or educational classes outside of the home if the tutor or instructor is unrelated to the student; dual enrollment in an institution of higher education; and educational therapies for students with disabilities.
Second, the Act allows tax-free treatment to apply to distributions of certain amounts used to make payments on principal or interest of a qualified education loan. No individual may receive more than $10,000 of such distributions, in aggregate, over the course of the individual’s lifetime. To the extent that an individual receives in excess of $10,000 of such distributions, they are subject to the usual tax treatment of 529 distributions (i.e., the earnings are included in income and subject to a 10-percent penalty). The provision contains a special rule allowing such amounts to be distributed to a sibling of a designated beneficiary (i.e., a brother, sister, stepbrother, or stepsister). This rule allows a 529 account holder to make a student loan distribution to a sibling of the designated beneficiary without changing the designated beneficiary of the account. For purposes of the $10,000 lifetime limit on student loan distributions, a distribution to a sibling of a designated beneficiary is applied toward the sibling’s lifetime limit, and not the designated beneficiary’s lifetime limit. The deduction available for interest paid by the taxpayer during the taxable year on any qualified education loan is disallowed to the extent such interest was paid from a tax-free distribution from a 529 plan.
Third, the Act allows tax-free treatment to apply to distributions made for certain additional qualifying expenses on behalf of designated beneficiaries attending elementary or secondary
school. Under the provision, in addition to tuition, tax-free treatment would apply to a distribution made for expenses for fees, academic tutoring, special needs services, books, supplies, and other equipment, incurred in connection with enrollment or attendance at such elementary or secondary school.
The provision applies to distributions made after December 31, 2018.
Increases failure-to-file penalty
Regarding the failure-to-file penalty, the Taxpayer First Act of 2019 stated the following:
The Federal tax system is one of ‘‘self-assessment,’’ i.e., taxpayers are required to declare their income, expenses, and ultimate tax due, while the IRS has the ability to propose subsequent changes. This voluntary system requires that taxpayers comply with deadlines and adhere to the filing requirements. While taxpayers may obtain extensions of time in which to file their returns, the Federal tax system consists of specific due dates of returns. In order to foster compliance in meeting these deadlines, Congress has enacted a penalty for the failure to timely file tax returns.
A taxpayer who fails to file a tax return on or before its due date is subject to a penalty equal to five percent of the net amount of tax due for each month that the return is not filed, up to a maximum of 25 percent of the net amount. If the failure to file a return is fraudulent, the taxpayer is subject to a penalty equal to 15 percent of the net amount of tax due for each month the return is not filed, up to a maximum of 75 percent of the net amount. The net amount of tax due is the amount of tax required to be shown on the return reduced by the amount of any part of the tax that is paid on or before the date prescribed for payment of the tax and by the amount of any credits against tax that may be claimed on the return. The penalty will not apply if it is shown that the failure to file was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect.
If a return is filed more than 60 days after its due date, and unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause, then the failure to file penalty may not be less than the lesser of $205 or 100 percent of the amount required to be shown as tax on the return. If a penalty for failure to file and a penalty for failure to pay tax shown on a return both apply for the same month, the amount of the penalty for failure to file for such month is reduced by the amount of the penalty for failure to pay tax shown on a return. If a return is filed more than 60 days after its due date, then the penalty for failure to pay tax shown on a return may not reduce the penalty for failure to file below the lesser of $205 or 100 percent of the amount required to be shown on the return.
The failure to file penalty applies to all . . . income tax returns of an individual, fiduciary of an estate or trust, or corporation, self-employment tax returns, and estate and gift tax returns.
The SECURE Act increases the failure-to-file penalty to the lesser of $435 or 100 percent of the amount of tax due for returns due after December 31, 2019.
The House Ways and Means Committee noted that the penalties for failing to file tax returns have not been increased in several years, and it believes that increasing the penalties will encourage the filing of timely and accurate returns which, in turn, will improve overall tax administration.